Pro Tip: using “Z’s” in the title of your already tough-sale XBLIG is probably not a good idea. Especially when the visuals for your game look like they belong in an advertisement for sleep medication. Zomp 3 is the latest Lolo clone to hit the Xbox Live Indie Game scene. It’s the fourth one I’ve tackled here at Indie Gamer Chick. The previous three all rank in the top 30 on my Leaderboard as of this writing. It’s weird, because Lolo as a franchise has been dead for twenty years. Hell, Lolo can’t get any love from Nintendo these days, even though one of the main guys behind the series is now the fucking president of the company! Pretty shitty that they’ve blue balled fans of the, ahem, blue ball.
Why is everyone so sleepy? Even the trees are on Ambien here.
Zomp 3 gets the spirit of Lolo right. There’s 100 puzzles that are structured fairly similar. Instead of collecting hearts, you collect Z’s. Once you get all of the Z’s in a room, the door opens up. Enemies are similar to Lolo too. There’s guys who give chase, guys who pin you in, and guys that shoot and kill you if you cross in front of their line of sight. The only real twist to the enemies formula is little slug things that don’t kill you directly, but if you cross their slime trail you pass away. I don’t expect every game to tinker too much with the source material, but after Aesop’s Garden and Spy Leaks, this is a huge step backwards.
It’s still fun, and the puzzles are still clever, but it’s all bundled in a very ugly, very clunky package. I try to avoid talking about bad graphics as long as they’re not detrimental towards gameplay. Zomp 3 doesn’t fall into that category, but the graphics are pug-fuggly, to the point of being painful to look at. Everything is very rudimentary looking. On a platform like XBLIG, that is expected from time to time. Still, maybe I’m just a little too in love with some of the previous games that aped Lolo. Spyleaks looked amazing. Aesop’s Garden looked like an NES game. Even Crystal Hunters looked sort of cool. Zomp looks cheap, rushed, and unfinished. And some ideas that aimed to change-up the backdrops, like having stages underwater, just make it look like your TV blew a color tube.
This is one of the underwater levels I’m talking about. All it did was make an ugly game uglier. That’s like adding a garage to your house by driving your car through your living room.
There’s also an issue with the controls, as in, they suck. Every Lolo game has been a bit stiff on the controls, but Zomp 3 takes it to a new extreme. Imagine playing a game like Lolo if Lolo controlled like Frogger. It’s a comparison the developer reluctantly agreed with when I brought it up. It doesn’t break the game by any means, but it will lead to cheap deaths and many moments of repetition. XBLIG developers, you have got to work harder on controls. People won’t quit out of a demo of a game because the graphics suck, especially if they’ve gone that far into the sampling process. But if the controls are bad, they might. And once they have, you’ve lost them forever.
I want to stress that I still really enjoyed Zomp. It’s not easy on the eyes and it handles like shit, but there’s still a well designed game here. It’s probably the easiest of the Lolo clones on XBLIG, and veterans of the series should be able to breeze past the 100 stages in a couple of hours. But, it’s still a smart game. The puzzles here are actually more accessible than some of the stuff I’ve dealt with on Indie Gamer Chick. Some of the ones in Spy Leaks made me sit back and say “what kind of fucking egghead decided to make this instead of spending their time curing cancer?” And puzzles in Gateways made me weep for the Nobel Prize that was lost by its creator. No doubt something involving dimensional string theories. That’s what I like about Zomp 3. It has puzzles that anyone can solve without getting a headache, but still get a feeling of accomplishment. For all its problems, talent is on display here. I feel like I should take some kind of role as an XBLIG development match maker. Pair the Zomp 3 guy with someone who can make better graphics, and hopefully the game will sell. No, not one of the XBLIG boobie game guys. I’m looking for a smart puzzler, not Titris.
I’m often surprised by an XBLIG that seems like it should be bad, but turns out to be decent or better. Moments like those are what have made Indie Gamer Chick worthwhile. On the flip side of that, there have been plenty of good-looking games that turn out to be pretty bad. Surprisingly, the truly rare moments are those that involve games that look bad, but turn out even worse than I could have anticipated. When I play a game and it seems like the concept of fun has completely drained out of the entire world, leaving an impenetrable void of unhappiness in its wake. When I’m unsure if gaming will ever be the same to me. When I honestly question whether or not I want to keep going with this Indie Gamer Chick stuff, or take up a less painful hobby, like self-mutilation.
Aah, Halloween Pie! is one of those rare games. It looks bad. But it’s even worse when you sit down and play it. It is, beyond a shadow of a doubt, the worst game I’ve ever played in my entire life. Worse than Sententia. It’s not even close.
I’ve seen Barbies more life-like.
I guess the idea with Ahh, Halloween Pie! was to make a boob version of Ghosts ‘N Goblins. The game starts with a cut scene that lasts over a minute if you don’t mash the A-button. f you do mash the A button, it will still take you a little over 30 seconds. It’s unskippable, and you have to watch it every time you start a new game. Immediately upon spawning, you’ll take damage from a skeleton that pops up. Once you take damage, your top flies off and you’re reduced to walking around in your underwear. I’m not sure if this cheap hit was done on purpose to get the motors revving of the horndog squad. Probably. Although I can’t believe anyone would find the character models here to be erotic. Unless of course you have a wax-museum fetish. I’m sure such a thing exists, but I refuse to Google it, for fear that I would have to bleach my brain again.
So you walk around, shooting projectiles at skeletons and crows. The movement physics are stiff. Probably not as stiff as this game’s target demographic, but pretty stiff. Enemies are placed in ways designed to cause you to die quickly and cheaply. If you shoot at a skeleton while it rises up from the ground, the bullet passes straight through it. Annoying, but at least you can just wait for it to spawn all the way. Unless, of course, the skeleton is too close to you. At which point, the bullet will pass straight through it. Grumble. So decent collision detection was not exactly priority #1 during Halloween Pie’s development, but who cares? BOOBS!
There’s no actual objective to Halloween Pie until you enter the house of a witch. She asks you to fetch five pumpkins from which she will build a pie. Upon exiting her house, you are almost guaranteed to take damage from a skeleton, since two skeletons spawn on both sides of you. Since entering her house is necessary towards making progress, this was quite the dick move. If you enter the house while just in your underoos, you’re pretty much dead. Lose three lives, and you get to start over, watching that unskippable cut-scene again.
Assuming you get out of the witch’s house alive, you have to go gather five pumpkins that are scattered around a stage. If you get these and return them to the witch, she fucks up the pie and you get to start over. Only this time, you need to find seven pumpkins. You leave her house again (another near-guaranteed hit against you), and now you have to deal with skeletons that throw bones at you. Find these seven and.. honestly I don’t know. By this point, I had dealt with numerous cheap deaths, unskippable cut-scenes, shoddy collision detection, and overall shoddiness. After a while, you get sick of taking damage from enemies that are a full length away from you, neither touching you nor facing you. Like in Ghosts ‘N Goblins, you can find clothes to put back on. Except here, when you put it on, you’re frozen in place so the chick can get whistled at. Stay classy, game.
Anyone unfortunate enough to have played the NES game Barbie will find the movement physics familiar. This is not a good thing.
I guess in theory you could finish this, if you wanted to take the time to get good at it. But who in their right mind would? This game is a pile of shit. And not even good shit, the kind you use to plant fields and feed people. This is the kind that turns white, petrified, and makes you dry-heave when you attempt to clean it up. And what makes it really shameful is it not only looks bad, plays bad, and sounds bad, but it’s also one of those games whose sole purpose is to lure in the horny loser demographic that thrives on XBLIG. It’s as if the developer knew that no effort would be needed. As long the game had a pair of tits on the cover art, and screenshots of a woman walking around in underwear, the bruised-pecker brigade would show up in droves. Proof that when it comes to digital knockers, if you build it, they will come.
80 Microsoft Points noted that judging by the top selling charts, it would seem that Ingenious Fun should reconsider whether there’s a market for horrible games with ugly, waxy looking women in the making of this review.
Please note: the developer requested I do this review. I wouldn’t have touched this shit with a ten-foot pole otherwise.
Aeternum. I didn’t love it. Couldn’t even beat the first stage. So why am I talking to the developers? Well, because they’re my friends. And, let’s face it, in this crazy modern world, cronyism is the glue that holds everything together. Besides, it was late Friday night and after having a nuclear-level seizure, I figured games would be semi-off limits for the weekend. I needed something to post, and my friends were in to lend me a hand. It’s enough to make you cry tears of blood, is it not?
Sometimes a game comes along that really surprises me. I thought nothing of Space Crüesader. The generic name coupled with the tired twin-stick shooter genre seemed to doom the game before I even booted it up. Imagine my surprise when I discovered its one of the better games to come out in months. I feel ashamed that I could be so prejudice. I swear, I’m not really like that. In fact, some of my best friends are twin-stick shooters!
With the market over-saturated with TwickS, anyone attempting one needs a solid hook. Looking at the cover art for Space Crüesader, I figured the hook was “same old shit, only this one has a mock Atari 2600 box art.” Wrong. The hook is actually rescuing stranded ships. There are six “zones” in the game, which is fancy talk for stages. In each stage, you have X amount of time to rescue X amount of ships. To rescue a ship, you have to park on top of it and let a meter fill up. You have unlimited lives, but if you don’t save all the ships in the time limit, it’s game over. To the best of my knowledge, it’s an original idea. Even better: it’s an original idea that makes a mundane genre exciting and fun again. So many bright ideas end up being video game polio, crippling an otherwise decent title. Not this time.
TwickS are a common theme in XBLIG because, from what I hear, they’re relatively easy to design. I haven’t really played any that are horrible. Even the sperm game. It sucked because the idea that you were shooting sperm was the only hook to the game. But as boring as it was, it played well, with good control and clear visuals. So saying Space Crüesader has good control isn’t unique to it. By the way, Space Crüesader has nearly perfect control.
You’ll need it too, because the screen is often completely spammed with so much shit that you can barely move. Most of this comes in the form of asteroids, but there’s also comets, enemy ships, some of which fire heat-seeking missiles at you. Soon, different enemy ships come in that fly fast, shoot faster, and go after you like they’re on a suicide mission. While this is going on, the amount of asteroids on the screen grows to absurd levels.
Yea, it’s a mess. For what it’s worth, it doesn’t look that bad in motion.
Oh, and there’s a needless background that absolutely wrecks the game sometimes because you can’t fucking see what’s going on. At best, the options allow you to dull it. You can’t completely turn it off though, and that sucks because the colors typically match objects such as items, enemy fire, and even some of the smaller asteroids. There’s no good reason for this. If it was done for artistic reasons, it’s a bad move, because graphics should never get in the way of gameplay. Ever. If it was to increase the challenge, again, bad move. Challenge is fine, as long as it’s fair. Making enemy bullets hard, or possibly impossible to spot isn’t fair. It’s frustrating. Ultimately, the game would have been more fun without the backgrounds. If you’re developing for XBLIG, the first question you should ask when adding stuff to make a game challenging is “does this make the game less fun?” If it does, don’t do it. Yea, it really is that simple.
There’s a few other problems. Sometimes the rescue ships are fairly close to the edge of the screen. Because asteroids fly in randomly, it’s sometimes absolutely impossible to defend yourself against them. By the time you’re on the third stage, the level is almost completely caked in enemies and asteroids, so it’s bad enough without having stuff fly at you where you don’t have the time or ability to not die from it. I kind of wish it did things Asteroid-style, where you fly off the edge of one screen and come out the other. And where the FUCK is hyperspace? Nobody puts hyperspace in their games anymore. It’s just faded away, like Steven Seagal.
One final complaint I have is upgrades come too slowly. You get them by picking up tiny little crystals that scatter around when you shoot asteroids. The problem is it takes a metric fuck-ton of them before you actually get a boost. Also, stuff like shields or the plasma canisters don’t spawn enough. The shield might spawn more and I simply couldn’t see it on the grounds that it blends in too much with the background (that happens), but it really does seem random. Of course, once you die, you’ve lost all your upgrades. On later stages, you might as well restart once you die because your standard weapon is way too slow even think about tackling a screen where there’s barely a centimeter of free space on the board. And there’s no possible way you can hope to collect enough crap to get it back up to full strength. I’m not exaggerating when I say the screen is completely suffocated with enemies.
See what I mean about the background? It renders even the screenshots incomprehensible. You know, Asteroids didn’t need that shit. If you couldn’t see what you were doing in Asteroids, would it have been one of the biggest games ever? I think the answer is no.
It sounds like I hated the game, but actually, I loved it. For all the problems it has, and some of those problems are huge, Space Crüesader is one of the best XBLIGs of the year. I’m disappointed in it because it should have been a top 10 game. It had all the tools to be such. An awesome hook, decent graphics, great play control, global leaderboards (though they were as fickle as always on XBLIG thanks to requiring a shitty peer-to-peer system, we really need to picket Microsoft to get them to change this), and a fun co-op mode. The classy developer even put in an option to remove flashing effects for those with a similar form of epilepsy to my own. So don’t let any of the bitching above turn you away from this. Space Crüesader is one of the best titles on Xbox Live Indie Games. In a just world, it would be a top seller. Alas, I think the name is too generic to get your average person to click it. If it was called Boob Boobsader and featured a pair of boobs shooting other boobs, it would be the top trending game on my site and the #1 seller on the marketplace. Feel free to steal that idea for the sequel.
I dig the Atari 2600 box art, but wouldn’t it be more fitting in a game that has Atari 2600 style visuals?
80 Microsoft Points have a boyfriend that said “bad comparison, because people are happy that Steven Seagal faded away” in the making of this review. He has a point I suppose.
Once upon a time, I had friends who did XBLIG reviews right alongside me. There was Two Fedoras, Gear-Fish, and Armless Octopus. Then my friends all left writing game reviews to making games, leaving me all alone to fend off titles about sperm by myself. Well, now their games have all hit. First was Dave’s horrid Pong clone, a game so bad it has now taken a place on the Wong-Baker pain scale.
“I don’t know doctor. This pick axe lodged in my skull hurts a lot, but I don’t think its quite as bad as Piz-ong.”
And now we have Aeternum, designed by Brooks Bishop of Two Fedoras, with an assist in writing from Nate Graves of Gear-Fish. What is Aeternum? Why, it’s a bullet hell! See though, there’s a difference between this game and the Pong game that Dave made. That difference is this is the type of game Brooks has always wanted to make. My gut tells me that Dave never dreamed of making a Pong game. As a kid, he probably did imagine making a game with rocking Genesis box art, but I’m sure his vision probably involved Mega Man fighting Saddam Hussein or something.
Personally, I hate bullet hells. I know I’ve said that I don’t have any biases against any particular genres, but that was what can politely be described as a fib. I just don’t get the damn things. A challenge is one thing, but bullet hells typically cross the line over into digital self-mutilation. Part of my disdain for them comes from the fact that I totally missed the 2D shooter era. I didn’t grow up with Gradius, R-Type, or Raiden. Maybe if I had spent my formative years hunkering down on those, I would have the skills necessary to make it more than five minutes in a bullet hell. Alas, no. I did have Ikaruga for the GameCube, but its a soul-crushing bastard that I barely spent enough time with to form an opinion at all. Then I developed epilepsy at sixteen and had an excuse to never touch a bullet hell ever again, proof that every cloud has a silver lining.
So here’s the awkward moment: Nate and Brooks are my friends. Nate and me have shared many amazing, emotional conversations. Brooks designed my Sweetie character, a variation of which now graces a few games on the marketplace as my Seal of Approval. I don’t necessarily want to hurt their feelings. Then again, they wanted to hurt my pride and make me question my skills as a gamer. How else do you explain them making a bullet hell? Besides, I was so pissed at Dave for Piz-ong that I sent him to his room to think about what he had done. And that was just for a bad Pong clone. For a bullet hell, I think I’m legally entitled to water-board Nate & Brooks.
The dialog by Nate Graves is, um, hey look, a kitty!
Aeternum (Latin for “Eternal”, the amount of torment one can expect from this fucker) is a loving tribute to evil games with badly translated Japanese. You play as some anime thing that has to shoot bullets at other anime things, such as things that look like strawberry milkshakes, or giant squids that go by names like Archibald the Cat Wrangler. It’s quirky! It’s Japanese! It’s.. fucking impossible. I’m sorry, but I put two separate one-hour sessions into this and I couldn’t get past the first stage. I could get as far as a fight with some other flying anime chick thing, but she spams the screen with fast-moving bullets. I’m going to be the laughing-stock of hardcore gamers everywhere, but I couldn’t make any progress at all. And this was the normal difficulty! But then again, I couldn’t even past her on practice mode. I’m just not wired for this shit.
Here’s what I did observe: the controls seem responsive. The graphics are well done. And every screen-wide spamming is allegedly survivable. I’m not personally willing to put in the time to learn how to survive them, but if you’re into this sort of thing, enjoy. It’s not friendly towards people who don’t like the genre, and I outright didn’t get things like the focus mode, which slows you down but not the bullets. I went through the tutorial a couple of times trying to figure out what benefit there was to it, or to grazing bullets, but the game fails to properly articulate it.
What I’m depressed about is there are now two games out by my former colleagues and I hated them both. They’re my friends, you know? I want them to do well. When we talk about their games, I want to be able to do so lovingly, without having to change the conversation to a more pleasant subject. Like whether or not they think this mole growing on the back of my hand is cancerous or not.
This is as far as I could make it. Shameful? Um, hey look, a puppy!
Props to them though. I couldn’t make a game. Nor am I likely to, say, hypothetically pay someone to make a game for me. A broken one, designed to test how much effort is put into the peer-testing system. A game that has at least one crash, one major play control issue, one major collision detection issue, two other evil checklist violations, and various spelling and grammar errors, which I would then submit for peer review just to see how much you dipshits actually try to find this stuff. Yea, I wouldn’t even consider doing that. See this —> 🙂 That’s a smiley face. And it would not lie to you.
Oh, and Aeternum can put a gun to its own temple and send itself to bullet hell Hell. Which I imagine is where bad bullets go, like the one that killed Bambi’s mother.
In sports, Knicks beat the Warriors 103 to 95. Or possibly 99 to 93. In fact, we’re not even sure if the Knicks won. Carmelo Anthony had 31 points off 27 for 27 shooting from the field. That statistic is actually impossible, but we can only report on the numbers as they are given to us.
Thankfully, real life sports statistics tend to be fairly accurate, unlike the post-game stats that Null Battles spits out. Talking about the type of game it is (arena shooter), how it plays (kind of fun, kind of sloppy), and what makes it unique (strange gravity effects) is, quite frankly, irrelevant. I find that knowing who wins or loses arena shooters is a pretty big deal to most gamers. I’m the type of person who meticulously studies my post-game stats when I play Halo or Gears of War or Call of Duty. If those games reported different scores and stats to each player, who would want to play them? I wouldn’t.
I tried reviewing Null Battles back in early September and this problem came up. When I took on my amigo Bryce online, this is the score that showed on their screen.
And this is what showed up on mine.
Same game, vastly different stats. My policy with online games is to give developers a chance to fix the problems before I post the proper review. I got notice that the game was finally ready a few weeks ago, but I got caught up in the latest batch of new releases and forgot to go back to Null Battles. As it turns out, there was no reason to rush. Again, here are the results from Bryce’s side of things.
And here are the results from mine.
Again, same game. We’re in agreement of the following things: #1, Bryce did NOT have 100% headshot percentage, and I didn’t have anywhere close to 70%. #2, none of the scores seemed to lineup with what was happening in the game, except the fact that I lost. #3, not knowing does negate the amount of fun you have leading up to it. Sorry, it just plain does. Maybe not for some (Brian for example) as much as it did so for me. But this is my blog and I have to say this problem renders Null Battles appeal null and void.
80 Microsoft Points have absolutely no interest in playing split-screen multiplayer in this day and age in the making of this review.
A review copy was provided by Techno Hermit Games for this review. The copy played by Indie Gamer Chick was purchased by her with her own Microsoft Points. The opinions of this review are her’s alone.
They still have a Second Chance with the Chick. If the scores were accurate, this game would have made the Leaderboard.
Well, this has never been done before. A review of a game done while simultaneously interviewing the developer. I almost didn’t review Three Dead Zed, which sponsors my review index. Sponsorship on my site is done by donating to charities (either Autism Speaks or the Epilepsy Foundation), so I don’t personally gain anything from it. Well, unless the $50 minimum that is contributed to the Epilepsy Foundation is exactly what they need at that very moment to cure epilepsy forever. And you never know, that might happen! Still, I didn’t want to be accused of a conflict of interest. If the game sucked, that’s fine. Nobody would accuse me of slamming a game because it sponsored my site. But, what if the game was good? What if it was the best XBLIG I’ve ever played? People would question whether it was legitimate or not.
Thankfully for me (and not so thankfully for the guys at Gentleman Squid), I don’t have to worry about it. Three Dead Zed is atrocious. The idea is you control three zombies, switching between them to make your way across platforms, shoving boxes, avoiding lasers, and killing people. The game looks great, but the controls are never responsive. The standard, default zombie feels sluggish and slow, and the jumping physics feel too heavy. This is the only zombie that can climb ladders or hit switches. On the flip side of this, there’s a quadrupedal that moves way too fast, jumps way too high, too far, and is a nightmare to control. It can’t climb ladders, operate switches, or do anything but jumping and wall jumping. Finally, there’s a giant, angry she-zombie that you use to break down walls and move heavy objects. This one is slower than death by starvation, can’t jump, and its attacks don’t feel like they have any oomph to them.
Basically, I didn’t like Three Dead Zed at all. Since I was due to interview developer Fabian Florez, I figured I would kill two birds with one stone and do the interview at the same time, and see what he had to say about some of the issues I had. All things considered, he was a good sport about it!
Cathy: Before I get to brow-beating you for the ungodly piece of shit that is the game you made, can you give me a little background on your team and how you guys came together?
Fabian Florez: Heh. Well we all work in the same main company. We normally make interactive training for things like online courses for schools or other technical related subjects. Well, the main business was getting slow, and rather than let us all go, I proposed that we take a crack at making games. We had all the primary people needed for a team right there: Artists, programmers, lover of games. So they took a chance on us. Now, with my review coming up, I think “Why would you make this piece of shit” might hurt my chances of a good review.
Cathy: If your job security was depended upon how likely your supervisor is able to hit one of the light switches in the game, would you just immediately start packing your desk?
Fabian: NEXT QUESTION PLEASE!
Cathy: Do you know pink slips typically aren’t pink? The ones I use are white. Even the rubber stamp isn’t pink. More like a crimson.
Fabian: I don’t even think they give slips at all. They just coral you into a room and just say, “Yea it’s been nice but you got to go.”
Cathy: Okay, okay, in all seriousness, why are the controls in Three Dead Zed so all over the place?
Fabian: We drink a lot. OK, *I* drink a lot. It seemed to make sense to me when I was playtesting…that one night…before release. Can you help clarify a specific point?
Cathy: I’ll start with the speedy dude that runs on all fours. It’s too easy to overshoot everything. He moves too fast, he jumps too far, and it’s too loose so it’s easy to over jump stuff. But the controls are also so loose that if you try self-correct mid-air, you’re just as likely to under-jump.
Fabian: He’s very debatable. Some people don’t mind him and adapt quickly. Others hate him outright. I do think it’s a bit of a failure on our part for tutorials and stage layout. For example, on the second tutorial stage after you unlock him, some people don’t just jump straight up. I’ve seen people play this on YouTube, streams, and in person. They always want to jump in a direction first. He jumps higher and you can have a control fall if you do that first. Or jump higher to stick to a higher part of the wall. Sometimes I’ve seen people always want to jump with him everywhere. Some of the jumping puzzles were meant to be played with the classic zombie, not the jumper, but it’s not obvious enough. That’s just a failure on us.
I could go more into it, but ultimately, a game should just be played without a “guide” so I think that’s why we get hot/cold responses.
Cathy: I get a lot of developers who want to send me a detailed analysis of how to play their game when they request a review. Always pisses me off and gets things off on the wrong foot. Doesn’t mean I am certain to hate a game (Hidden in Plain Sight’s developer did it and I ranked it), but it feels like developers know from the get-go there are problems and still release anyway. Do you think if you had held off on release you could have addressed these issues, or did the game pass the point of no return for salvation?
Fabian: That’s a great question. We initially released the game earlier in the year for Windows and we though we addressed a lot of those initial issues. Our tutorial section for example is longer and added things to what we though might be “second nature” had to be added. Like the area showing you how to drop down from floors. So unfortunately, it’s just that developer trap of “I think we got everything! Release it. OH NO not again!” Tried to touch all bases, but I think it’s really difficult.
But, I think there was also some confusion on our part because a lot of those comments did come from people playing with a keyboard. We did get feedback from people saying switching to a controller made things easier. So, porting to Xbox seemed like it would alleviate that since you can only play with a controller.
Cathy: There’s a lot of niggling control issues. Jumping off ladders with the default zombie, hitting switches, and some problems with collision detection. We’ll start with the switches first. I’m personally having problems lining up and pushing them correctly. Brian isn’t. His IQ is about 50 points lower than mine, so if your target audience is dumbass pseudo-gingers, mission accomplished, but wouldn’t larger area-detections be a no-brainer?
Fabian: Switches: It’s a pretty sizable hit detection. It was increased from the Windows to the Xbox build. The reason why it’s not even bigger, if I remember correctly, is because we didn’t want you activating things behind a wall on the other side on some scenarios. We’ll take a look at it again though.
Ladders is the new one that I did witness in our Peer Review. Never heard that until we ported it. It’s another one of those, “Probably include it in the tutorials?” Push left or right and jump. I saw Ryan (aka MasterBlud of VVGTV) playing the game and he was stating how he hated the ladders also. The problem there is we have areas where you are going to want to jump from ladder to ladder. If you just push left or right and he drops, you wont be able to jump to the ladder. Minus the actual jumping from ladder to ladder, this is very similar to Mega Man’s approach. Except once you push jump, Mega Man would drop.
Cathy: I get that you guys were trying to go for a Trine feel, but one of the other problems was the game couldn’t seem to decide what it should focus on: platforming or puzzling. Some games comfortably blend both, but this one seemed to jump from one to the other and it was jarring and killed the pace. I don’t really know how to word that into a question for you. First off, I assume Trine was inspiration for Three Dead Zed?
Fabian: We get Trine a lot and I swear, that was not our intent! It was one of those things that just happened that way. Although I owned it, I still haven’t played it. 3DZ was inspired by a mix of the C64 game Goonies and NES Batman (hence the wall cling). If you never played The Goonies, you controlled two people who need to do something to unlock a door. Tough as nails. Anyway, along the way, we dropped that because, hey, we’re new devs and that was biting off more than we can chew. So we combined them all together to be one “super zombie” and made it more of a traditional puzzle platformer. Nothing too crazy in the way of puzzles though simple things for the most part. The NES Batman was also a heavy influence on why the fast zombie sprints forward so quickly. Some like it. Some hate it. It was meant more for moving from wall to wall and that was it. “You are going this direction!”
(While this interview is going on, Bryce and my boyfriend Brian are playing through Three Dead Zed, enjoying it way more than I did, and start busting up laughing from chasing an old lady into a saw blade).
Cathy: Brian and Bryce just chased an old lady into a saw blade.
Fabian: Brian and Bryce, you are AWESOME. We wanted people to scare “innocents” into the hazards. We think it’s funny too. We almost had an award for scaring old ladies into buzz-saws but then pulled it.
Cathy: I guess this moves us into the art. It’s pretty good. It reminded me of the stuff by Behemoth (Castle Crashers, Alien Hominid). I find a lot of games on XBLIG that put a premium on audio-visuals tend to be mediocre or worse. You just became the poster child for that. Yay?
Fabian: *laughing* Well we tried! We thought, “Man if we could just make something so beautiful, it’ll be like a Greek Siren to Indie Gamer Chick and she’ll give us glowing reviews!”
Cathy: Good graphics do get my attention when it comes time to review a game, but once I start playing, gameplay is all that matters. However, your game does have appeal in other areas. The voice overs are great. Who did them?
Fabian: Awesome to hear! Get it?! Hear?
Cathy: ..
Fabian: Ahem.. Actually our star voice actor would love to read that. The two main voices you hear the most (intercom and shadowy figure) are actually the same guy. The intercom is inspired by Rick Moranis/Bill Murray in Ghostbusters. The Shadowy voice is…shadowy? The other voices are various people including the team. He also does the voice in the cut scene changing from zombie to zombie. He actually does professional voice over work, and he offered to help us out for free.
Cathy: Do you have any future plans for game development?
Fabian: After your review? No. Closing shop. Taking our ball home and doing lots of crying.
Cathy: Hang on one second, I need to add another check mark to my gun.
Fabian: Actually, yes. We’re working on another game. It’ll be our first multiplayer game. You can put the chisel down.
Cathy: Awwww.
Fabian: Hey, you killed our joy. Only fair we kill yours.
Cathy: Touché. What lessons did you learn from making Three Dead Zed that you’re going to apply to the development of.. what the fuck is it called anyway?
Fabian: It’s called 2012. Better late than never? Actually we have no name yet. Basically: Playtest, playtest, and playtest. You really can’t do enough. We did quite a bit for Three Dead Zed (Both online and in person) but you just really need to do more than you think. A BIG sample definitely helps you find trouble areas.
Cathy: Have anything to say in closing?
Fabian: I do thank you for trying out our game regardless! You’re tough as nails, we’ll hopefully win you over with the next game.
I hope so too. I would like to thank Fabian for being cool about this admittedly awkward situation. He’s a good guy, and he should be proud of his efforts. I still can’t recommend Three Dead Zed though. Great graphics, great concept, and its heart was in the right place. It’s just not beating.
What can I say about the Trailer Park King games that I haven’t already said here, here, or here? Nothing has changed for the third (or fourth) installment. Horrible voice acting. Ridiculous, nonsensical plot. Lack of actual gameplay. Humor so crude and forced that it would make Seth MacFarlane blush with shame. By all rights, these are games I should hate. So why do I keep coming back to them? More importantly, why do I keep adding them to my Leaderboard? Granted, not one game in the series is in the top 100, but still, shouldn’t I be lining them up against a wall and gunning them down like Al Capone? These are bad games. I’m known to clean and gut bad games and mount them on my wall. So what the fuck, Cathy?
Doctor House would diagnose the nurse with explosive jug syndrome. Or it could be lupus.
I think part of it is how much Trailer Park King revels in its subject matter. The characters are all so uncouth, shallow, and flat-out stupid that you can’t help but laugh at it. Another part of it is developer Sean Doherty is Canadian and it strikes me as a potentially offensive look at how our neighbors to the north view the poor of our country. It straddles the line between parody and socioeconomic bigotry, but it’s so damn absurd that nobody could possibly be offended. It’s also one of those “raunchy” games that other developers burn in effigy. I see where they’re coming from, but Trailer Park King doesn’t strike me as particularly sexy. The characters here are so.. well.. trashy, that I can’t believe anyone could get off on this stuff. If these were real people, you could probably get an STD just by thinking about them while jerking off. Never mind that the characters are grossly malnourished and their tits are obviously fake.
It’s rare that games on XBLIG are so bad that they’re good, but that’s the best way to summarize the Trailer Park King series. They’re guilty pleasures. The series might be running out of steam though. This time around, you have to prove that series antagonist Truck is not a zombie. How do you do this? Well, zombies can’t dance, can’t be hypnotized, eat brains, animals don’t like them, and most important, they can’t be anal probed. So you run down those things like a checklist and see if Truck takes the bait on any of them. It’s as dumb as it sounds, but it’s still funny in a self-aware “I’m playing a game where someone shoves a large anal prob up a dude’s ass to prove he’s not a zombie” sort of away.
The only minigame in Trailer Park King carries on the tradition of being needless and dull.
For the third (or fourth) episode in the series, there’s only one mini-game: a shooting gallery where you must fire on wanted posters that have descriptions like “skank” or “dumbass.” Prior knowledge of the series is probably required, or you can just wait for dumbass to pop up and shoot the posters of Truck like I did. It’s not the most well conceived, but it’s better than the sliding puzzle of Cherry Poke Prison. Otherwise, the game seemed like the shortest of the series (it took me about thirty minutes to finish) and the jokes are starting to wear a bit thin. I still enjoyed Trailer Park King 3, but I won’t be reviewing any more games in the series. Quite frankly, I’m running out of stuff to say about them. They are what they are. You’ll either hate them on principle, or you’ll enjoy them for being utterly bad, yet oddly compelling pieces of shit. And hey, white trash is totally an in thing right now. If Ted Nugent is looking for someone to make a video game about her life, she should ring up Sean.
Writing about a really bad game is easy. Writing about a really good game is easy. When a game is middling, neither that good nor that bad, I struggle with my goal to write an entertaining review. I’ve done a few first-person shooters on XBLIG. Of them, two are on my leaderboard: Send in Jimmy and Devil Blood. As of this writing, they occupy the very bottom two spots. I’ll fully admit, those games are both atrocious and could (some would argue “should”) be exorcised from the board. But at least they were playable and fun in a train-wreck sort of way. Others have either been glitchy, poorly conceived, or just plain boring. I previously noted that I was surprised at how few FPSs are on XBLIG, considering that the Xbox 360 is pretty much a dedicated shooter console for many of its owners. Sadly, every XBLIG FPS plays like it arrived to the party about fifteen years too late to be enjoyable. Demon House is not really different. It’s not horrible, but it’s not exceptional enough to make this a fun review to write. This will probably not be one of my better ones, so here’s a preemptive apology. For what it’s worth, I’m doing Trailer Park King 3 next!
Weapon design in Demon House ranges from inspired to predictable, and getting the really fun stuff takes too long for such a short game.
First off, yea, Demon House looks relatively good. I mean, it still looks archaic. It would have been just fine in 2000 as a Nintendo 64 or PlayStation title. In 2012? It falls into the dreaded “it looks good for an XBLIG” category. And that’s where it also falls in other areas. It’s designed well. You know, for a FPS on XBLIG. The controls are pretty good, at least for an FPS on XBLIG. I accept that a first-person shooter is an incredibly hard game to design and the guys behind Demon House should be commended for creating one of the better ones on the platform. But all I care about is how much fun I can have with a game, and fun is a fleeting commodity here.
It started good. Really good in fact. The game opens inside a haunted house. This is your stereotypical amusement-park style ghost mansion, with all the clichés. Piano playing itself? Check. Spooky shadows? Check. Lightning custom-designed to give me a seizure? Grumble, check. Baby carriage that rocks itself? Check, and fucking creepy. I wasn’t kidding about the amusement park feel of Demon House. Considering that the enemies are all robotic devices, I kind of figured the concept here was supposed to be something like Westworld, where the animatronics had simply started to run amok. That would be an interesting plot, but instead you’re dealing with a mad alchemist. That’s lame, but at least the haunted house setting is.. oh. Never mind, that’s only for the first half of the game. The second half takes place in an utterly generic cathedral/catacombs place thingie that looks like it was lifted from Quake and/or any of a trillion Quake mods out there. Good move Photonic Games. I was almost interested for a bit.
The only thing Demon House: FPS had going for it that made it stand out was the legitimately creepy haunted house setting. Once you’re removed from that and instead inserted into the boring, sterile, lifeless second act, the game becomes a chore. Oddly enough, after about thirty minutes in that section, I was hoping the game would just end. And then it did. That was very kind of it.
It’s not THAT complex. I’m pretty sure enemies that stand back and shoot at you instead of charging at you has been around since I was at least old enough to ride the Haunted Mansion ride.
Let’s be clear here: I had fun with Demon House and it is going on the leaderboard. I liked the opening act that much. While playing it, I figured it could be a top-fifty game. Despite dated gameplay, the shooting mechanics are fun, the enemy design is neat, and the floor layout with the multiple hidden nooks made this enjoyable. And then you leave the house and suddenly you’re transported back to 1996, which is not where I wanted to be. The placement of the game started to sink. Not like a rock, which would have been quick and relatively painless. It sinks more like a boat. You know that scene in Titanic where they watch as the ship breaks apart and the lifeboats (some filled to half-capacity) look on in horror? Yea, Demon House is the Titanic and you’re Kathy Bates watching on in horror. Not me though. I’m more like Kathy Bates from Misery, taking a sledge-hammer to the feet of Photonic Games. Out of love of course. 🙂
The Wii U is out. This means all that’s left for the original Wii is the typical third-party shovelware that a dead system gets once its successor hits. In the Wii’s case, this is known as the status quo. I’m kidding. Mostly. But this really does mark the end of the Wii’s life cycle, as no major first or third-party titles are left for the system. That makes this a fitting time to look back on a console that alienated hardcore gamers (even slobbering Nintendo fanboys) and ultimately collected more dust than your average Egyptian tomb. And yet, even as sales of the system slowed, it retires having outsold its rivals by nearly thirty-million consoles each, and will go down as one of the most profitable video game consoles in history. Take a bow, Wii. Don’t worry, I won’t wedgie you.
Wii was controversial from the moment its controller was unveiled. It looked silly, gimmicky, and went against everything thirty years worth of convention said gaming controllers should be. People thought Nintendo had lost their fucking minds. I did too, but in retrospect I’m not sure why. Nintendo popularized the D-pad, shoulder-buttons, the analog stick, and rumbling controllers. There have been missteps (Virtual Boy) but otherwise Nintendo tends to get these things right. Then the name came out. Wii. We’ve all heard the jokes and bad puns, which I’m obviously not above doing as indicated by the title of this piece. This irrational hatred all stems from the codename being Revolution, which people got attached to, with no consideration that the word “revolution” is practically taboo in large parts of the world.
And, of course, the Wii was vastly underpowered compared to other consoles of the generation. People moaned that they had only made slight adjustments to the Gamecube and nothing more. As if this is a new practice. The NES was, more or less, a re-purposed Atari 2600. Both consoles had very similar processors, but the NES had access to components and features that were price-prohibitive in 1976 when the Atari was being speced out. I’m not excusing Nintendo for excluding HD though. Then again, I’m not really admonishing them either. This is Nintendo we’re talking about, a company that had an irrational phobia of disc based things and internet connectivity. Do you know what Nintendo is? Nintendo is my father. Impressed, or possibly obsessed, with “high-tech” inputs, but terrified of actual technological progress.
Punisher makers take note: your game can be difficult AND fun. Donkey Kong Returns proves that.
I’ll be honest: I’m not a fan of the system. It would rank a distant third for me among seventh-generation consoles. Fifth if you include the sublime Nintendo DS and the unsung workhorse that was the Sony PSP. But saying the Wii was the straggler of this generation is like making fun of a bench player on a Super Bowl Champion. This last generation was, and still is as long as the PS3 and Xbox 360 keep chugging along, the greatest generation in gaming history. So I don’t really care if the Wii was the dumping ground of shovelware and half-baked ideas. I wouldn’t really want to play third-party stuff on Wii anyway. I would rather play them on one of the other consoles, with all the bells and whistles those systems provided, instead of on the Wii with gimmicky controls.
Wii gave me what I wanted: high-quality first-party Nintendo games. That’s all I ever want out of a Nintendo console. Anyone who expected otherwise obviously has problems with pattern recognition. The Gamecube wasn’t exactly overflowing with third-party stuff that had a leg up on their PS2 or Xbox counterparts. The Nintendo 64 certainly didn’t. There might be a handful of exceptions, but the only reason any rational gamer would buy a Nintendo system is to play Nintendo games. And the Wii had more quality first-party stuff than previous consoles did. It’s not even close, in fact. So why the hate?
I got into an argument with a friend of mine over this. He felt Nintendo had abandoned “hardcore” fans. This is a very common argument among Nintendo fanboys. My short response: you’re wrong. My long response: you’re all stupid, entitled, butthurt idiots. And I can prove you’re wrong about Nintendo abandoning you. Again, the only reason to own a Nintendo console in this day and age is for the first-party exclusives. I know many of you cling to the era of the NES and SNES where Nintendo was king of the hill and had incredible third-party support. Sorry, but those days are long gone. They ceased to be in 1996 when Nintendo pissed off third-parties by keeping the cart format for the N64. There were almost 800 SNES games released in North America, versus around 250 Nintendo 64 games, and around 400 Gamecube games.
Then the Wii became an unprecedented hit. Nobody saw it coming. It also was cheap to produce games for and Nintendo was much more modest with licensing fees than they had been in previous generations. Suddenly, Wii is being flooded with hastily produced, low-quality shovelware. This created a fogging effect that made the overall picture appear deluded. Then Nintendo decided to really experiment with things like Wii Fit and Link’s Crossbow Trainer, and suddenly Nintendo fans felt like they were being ignored in favor of gimmicky, mass-market oriented stuff.
Huh?
Quick question to Nintendo fans: how many original Zelda games were on Nintendo 64? Two, right? How many on Gamecube? Two again (three if you count Twilight Princess as a Gamecube game). And how many were on Wii? Um, two?
How many proper Mario games were on Nintendo 64? You had Super Mario 64 and.. um.. that’s it. On Gamecube, you had Mario Sunshine and that’s it. On Wii, you had Super Mario Galaxy, Super Mario Galaxy 2, and New Super Mario Bros.
Not all first-party games were worthwhile. Mario Kart 7, Mario Party 8, and Animal Crossing were pretty big steps backwards in my opinion.
How many Metroid games were there on Nintendo 64? Oh that’s right: NONE. How many were on Gamecube? Two. How many were on Wii? Two.
How many Punch-Out games were on Nintendo 64? Zero. How many were on Gamecube? Zilch. How many were on Wii? One. One really good one.
And talking about over-using gimmicks: how many Donkey Kong Country games were on Gamecube? One, if you count Donkey Kong Jungle Beat, a 2D platformer where the controller was replaced by banging on a fucking BONGO to maneuver Donkey Kong. On the gimmicky Wii, you used standard controls.
There was a very good Paper Mario title, a decent 2D Wario Land title, two pretty good Kirby games, and a pretty good Fire Emblem title. And that’s just the franchised stuff. My friend also complained about the lack of original properties. I guess he missed Wii Sports (fuck all the haters, that game was fun), Endless Ocean, Fortune Street (making its North American debut), Big Brain Academy, the Art Style series on WiiWare, Sin & Punishment (and its Nintendo 64 predecessor that never made it stateside), and the way-overlooked Fluidity on WiiWare.
And for you fans of paying for the same shit you’ve already paid for once and played a million times, you had the Virtual Console, plus “Wii-makes” of previous generation stuff like Pikmin, Metroid Prime, Resident Evil 4, etc.
This is abandonment?
Look, I’m not going to deny that the Wii was a disappointment, but didn’t most of that stem from ambitious but ultimately shitty third-party games? Madworld, Conduit, Force Unleashed, and Epic Mickey spring to mind. But that ignores some really neat smaller titles, like Elebits or Boom Blox that were a lot of fun. While its true that my mind was never blown by anything third-party on the system, to say it was a wasteland of mediocrity is absurd.
I was quite fond of Zack & Wiki. It’s too bad nobody bought it.
Here’s one last thought on the Wii: if you were ten-years old, how much do you think you would like it? I’m guessing the answer is “a lot more than you would have at age 30.” Is it possible that your expectations were based on what Nintendo meant to you as a child? Because here’s a newsflash: your beloved NES and SNES were overflowing with garbage that you would absolutely detest if you had never played it and it was released today. I certainly would have liked Sonic and the Secret Rings a lot more if I was seven and the Wii had been my first machine, even though the game is not really that good. Just like how I loved Crash Bandicoot at that same age, a game I would loath if I played it today.
No, Nintendo didn’t abandon you, the hardcore gamer. They bent over backwards trying to appease you and keep you interested with the Wii. But Nintendo has competition that can’t be beaten: your own memories. The older you get, the more rosy those memories become, and the more insurmountable they become. So instead of bitching about gimmicks, power, or shovelware that you wouldn’t buy anyway, look at what Nintendo did for you with the Wii and tip your hat to them. Yea, my Wii sat unused for over a year before Skyward Sword showed up to disappoint me. Yea, I probably played it a small fraction as much as my other consoles. Yea, I would rather dive split-eagle on an electric fence than play 95% of the games on it. But despite being a strange, often clunky, underpowered piece of shit, it provided me with many hours of fun. I’ll miss it. You should too.
Zomp 3 was developed by Skelman Software
80 Microsoft Points said the dude even looks like Lolo in the making of this review. 
RSS - Posts
You must be logged in to post a comment.