T.E.C. 3001
August 25, 2011 12 Comments
Sigh. I really thought I was going to love T.E.C. 3001. It just looked so fun and polished. Stills of the game don’t do it justice. In motion, it’s really a sight to behold, almost like you’re running through the world of Tron. And the early buzz on Twitter from the usual gang of idiots (™Mad Magazine) is that it was the single greatest achievement in the history of gaming and milestone for Xbox Live Indie Games.
Of course, T.E.C. is none of that. It’s a barely controllable reflex-tester starring a robotic Sonic the Hedgehog wannabe. Yea, it’s pretty, but calling this “great” devalues the word to such a degree that the ghost of Ivan III is now going to personally haunt every single person that would label it as such. But I’m getting ahead of myself.
In T.E.C. 3001 you play as a robot that has to run around collecting batteries. In order to clear each stage, you have to get a minimum number of batteries before reaching the goal. I’m not sure why they bothered with this aspect. It wasn’t until very late in the game that I actually missed the target amount, and I only failed at this once. It seems kind of tacked on and not really necessary.
Running is handled automatically. All you do is dodge left and right, jump with A, and slide with B. Unfortunately, the controls fail the player more often than not. T.E.C. is designed in a way that requires the utmost precision for all movement and jumps, but you’re not provided with anything resembling smooth and responsive controlling at all. Your robot dude moves too damn fast, yet he handles like a shopping cart. Thus, you’ll spend the majority of the game running off ledges or crashing into pillars.
You also have a double jump that can be a bit on the fickle side. Sometimes it just didn’t want to work, almost at random it seemed. I would jump and wait until I was on a slight downward arc before jumping again and it would work. Then I would die and have to start over. I would try the same exact move, in the exact same spot, pushing the button for the double jump at what sure as hell seemed like the same moment I previously used it, and watch nothing happen except my dude fall to his death.
Still, I’ve played games that handled less than well but still managed to have a good time. And early on, that was the case with T.E.C. 3000. I immediately recognized that controlling would be an issue, but the amazing aesthetics and lightning-fast game play were sure to make up for it. And then, about four levels into the experience, I realized that everything from that point forward would revolve around trial-and-error game play so unforgiving that there would be no room left for fun. Allow me to walk you through a hypothetical level of T.E.C.
Start the level, avoid a pillar that you see, hit the pillar you couldn’t possibly see behind it.
Start the level over, avoid a pillar that you see, avoid the pillar you know is behind it, hit the barrier you couldn’t possibly see behind it.
Start the level over, avoid a pillar that you see, avoid the pillar that you know is behind it, jump over the barrier you know is behind that, hit the larger barrier you couldn’t possibly see behind it.
Start the level over, avoid a pillar that you see, avoid the pillar that you know is behind it, jump over the barrier you know is behind that, slide under the larger barrier you know is behind that, fall into a gap you couldn’t possibly see was there.
Does that sound fun to you? Because it sounds tedious and archaic to me. Games like this died out years ago for a reason: because they’re boring and people quit paying to play them. With the absurd levels of speed your dude runs, there’s just no margin for error here. They tried to make up for it by adding a decent amount of checkpoints in each stage, but it doesn’t help. Clear one memory-testing section of obstacles, start a new one. Yippee.
T.E.C. 3001 feels more like a concept build for something that, with the right amount of time and finesse, could be amazing. The graphics are among the best I’ve seen on the Xbox Live Indie Game market so far, and the idea of an insanely quick robot running through a neon-coated futuristic wonderland is pretty cool. But the stop-and-go nature of its game play negates the entire speed gimmick, and the controls kill off whatever pleasure remained. T.E.C. has style, but the only substance found is a cocktail of bad controls and level design that tastes like fecal matter.
Oh and before I go, I want to set the record straight on something: I don’t troll. If a game sucks, I say it. If I enjoy it, I say it. My standards aren’t even particularly high. I have no bias against any developer, person, or genre. I just want to have fun with a game that I purchase with money out of my pocket. If I don’t have fun, I’m not afraid to say it. If that rubs you the wrong way, I don’t know what to say except put on some pom-poms and a miniskirt because you are nothing but a cheerleader.
T.E.C. 3001 was developed by Phoenix Games
240 Microsoft Points said the 2011 Indie Game Summer Uprising still at least has a batting average good enough to start for the San Francisco Giants in the making of this review.
Follow me on Twitter and Facebook for a chance to win 1600 Microsoft Points. Click here for details.
Tweet this review or share it on Facebook for additional entries into the drawing!
Thank you so much to Gear-Fish, an awesome source of Indie news and reviews, for the IndieGamerChick Uprising logo seen above!
That basically sums up how my playing of the first 5 levels went. I hoped at some point that I would get a hang of the controls and be able to dart through levels. Probably only after 5 hours of play though
Unless you’re willing to dedicate your immediate future full-time to memorizing levels, there is no chance anyone is going to be darting through anything in TEC. The controls are not responsive enough to allow for quick reflexes to work. By time you spot something that is going to kill you, it’s already too late. You have to be reacting to stuff you haven’t even seen yet.
yeah, thats how the first few level went. After I beat the fifth level (first I missed the final gate, so I didn’t finish, that doesn’t make any sense) I went back to CTDV
Ouch!
I honestly would politely disagree. I didn’t find myself having too much trouble getting through the levels at all. I blazed through the tutorial levels and found myself having a blast through every Tron inspired level to proceed them. I’ll agree that there are a few glitches, framerate problems and some cheap spots where you’re going to mess up the first time or two when you play, but near the end of the game I found myself flying through them without a second thought. Maybe I just got extremely accustomed to it and “have cat like reflexes and speed” (Tommy Boy reference). Either way, I am still playing it and can’t put it down. I’ll be releasing my full review of it soon over on VVGTV along with a special video to accompany it so stay tuned!
I have to agree with Kyle. I felt like this was a really competent, fun, and responsive game. I have not finished it but I have played throuh enough of the levels to have a clear concept of the game. I haven’t had any issues with the double jump and I am really loving the difficulty of this game. It does certainly require some serious reaction timing and it can be frustrating when I don’t stick a landing right the first time or the 20th. But i can’t hold my own personal troubles against the game. That being said your opinion is certainly valid, my experience with the game it seems, just hasn’t been the same.
Perhaps the environment design should have strong visual clues to alert you to the upcoming hazards? With practice you’d be reacting to those instead of having to learn the hazards by trial and error.
Pingback: The Cusp: 2011 Indie Summer Uprising Retrospective « Indie Gamer Chick
I think people need to realize the kind of game this is: A fast twitch trial and error plat-former that goes back to the days when games were actually difficult, it requires time and yes memorization to master. but what’s wrong with that? I am in my mid-twenty’s and even I understand that this game makes you EARN your bragging rights. I also understand this game won’t appeal to everyone but it is not a valid reason to discredit it and give it a bad review. You have to view it within context of its game type. You say those games died out because they are boring and no one plays them anymore. THAT is a GROSS ASSUMPTION. I LOVE those games and I know many a gamer that also appreciates that game type. Games today are so easy, so streamlined, which has of course created a much broader base and increased demand (and has made gaming mainstream), but let us remember that games used to be a niche, and to call yourself a gamer actually meant something, I used to be the king of a little old fighting game called Killer Instinct and I had every character’s move list memorized in my head and no one could touch me. I earned that by pouring time into it, and you know what? IT FELT AWESOME, so while I understand why you might not like the game, just because it requires effort to master does not mean it sucks. I have just bought this game and it is a bargain for the its measly 240pts price. Not to mention the game isn’t nearly as crazy hard as you make it sound. Plus when you have a light-bulb moment (example: if you slide you can turn more sharply) and you start to use that trick you learned to get beat a level or shave a few seconds off the clock, IT FEELS AWESOME, plain and simple because no one told you how, you had to learn the nuances of the game yourself and are a better player because of it. AND THAT is one of the things that I miss most in today’s games, its just to damn easy.