Apple Jack

When I decided to include a top-10 feature on Indie Gamer Chick, I knew that doing so this early into my blog’s existence would cause a lot of crying foul.  Relax, guys.  I just got this place started, and I wanted to have a feature that would give developers something to aim for.  I know there are many well-respected indie titles that have been around for a while and I’m late to the party.  Guess what?  I want to play them.  I want every game, deserving or otherwise, to have a shot at making the leader board.

One game that kept coming up over and over was Apple Jack, a 2010 title by My Owl Software.  Everyone assured me it would not only land a spot on my top ten, but would be a contender for the #1 spot.  I consider the gauntlet laid down.

I booted up Apple Jack and was instantly amused when it told me that the story was a dude with an apple for a head out to rescue his dog.  That’s it in its entirety.  “Goody” I thought,  “no bullshit cut scenes!”  I was taken in by its colorful hand-drawn graphics and lighthearted music.  I also loved the concept of a platformer with no level end-goals.  Just kill all the enemies by throwing them into each other.  It gave it an almost Bubble Bobble like feel.

I made my way through the first few levels.  I felt the game was positively enchanting.  And then I lightly bumped into a baddie and died.  “Hmmm, no life bar.  How weird” I thought.  This was followed by a giant notice in big black letters that said “YOU ARE DEAD!”  “That seems out-of-place for a game this whimsical and friendly.”

I pressed on and noticed that the levels were suddenly ramping up in difficulty  By only fifteen boards in, I was actively cussing like a sailor who just slammed his hand in a car door.  Then the penny dropped.  “Wait a second.. THIS IS A PUNISHMENT PLATFORMER!” I blurted out to nobody in particular.

And boy, is it.  It’s a well-developed one, but it still hates you and wants you to suffer.  Ignore the whole “platformer” thing.  At its heart, Apple Jack is a puzzle game.  Figuring out how to make the most of the enemies you’re given to clear each stage is the true challenge of this game.  They threw in some spikes just to be spiteful dicks, but this is still a title where intelligence and planning will lead you to the promised land.  Getting there took me about seven hours of play time.  There’s 100 levels, each one trying to push you closer to heart failure.

Going back to the graphics, they look really great.  In fact, all the audio-visual stuff is among the best done of any game in the indie scene.  The developers kept the look clean and distinctive, so that nothing can be confused with anything else.  And the controls are really tight and accurate.

So I loved Apple Jack, right?  Wrong.  I fucking hated it.  Hated it, hated it, hated it!  It’s just too damn aggravating to be enjoyable.  Like nearly any other punishment platformer, fun gives way to frustration long before the game is over.  By level 20 I was nearly reduced to tears, literally collapsing to the ground after a bad jump led to me dying for the fiftieth time.   And then came the owls.  How I hated the fucking owls.  They shoot lasers at you, turning this already dead-in-one-hit game into the bullethell from hell.  I didn’t think it could get worse, and then came the eyeballs.  You know what, fuck it.   Just thinking about it brings me close to rage-quitting this review.

And honestly, although the level design can be very clever, it can also be extremely tedious and boring.  Sometimes stages feel like they just drag on and on, sort of like this review is doing.  I noticed about an hour in that I was having absolutely zero fun.  I have no clue why this kept coming up among games that are supposed to be heads and shoulders above the rest of the indie pack.  Maybe its graphics.  Maybe its concept.  But NOT its execution.  My policy is to not read outside reviews of games before I finish them myself.  I broke that rule for Apple Jack because I simply had to know what everyone else said.  And I want to drop the giant bullshit card on most of those reviewers who threw this vile thing high scores.  In my heart of hearts, I don’t believe more than ten percent of them actually finished the game.

Apple Jack seems like it’s going to be excellent when you first start.  I fell into that trap.  I told my boyfriend that it was going rank high on my top ten list.  In case it’s not obvious by now, it will not rank at all.  I firmly disliked 95% of my time with it.  It’s not that I can’t enjoy a good challenge, but that challenge has to be tempered with some level of entertainment.  Apple Jack simply proves so repetitive that it runs out of steam.  It’s ironic that it shares its name with the breakfast cereal Apple Jacks.  Because, like the cereal, Apple Jack is artificially sweetened and will leave you bleeding from your mouth.

Apple Jack was developed by My Owl Software

80 Microsoft Points were part of a complete breakfast in the making of this review.

Random the Dungeon

Random the Dungeon sounds like a rougelike but actually plays like a cross between Solomon’s Key and Corky from Life Goes On.  You’re a dude who must hop across various blocks to get a key.  Once you have it, you must get to the door.  The gimmick here is that if you can’t find a pathway to where you’re moving, you can switch the entire arrangement of blocks on the screen to a new, completely random alignment.

The game starts off pretty simple.  There’s a key, there are blocks, and there’s a door.  Get the key, get to the door.  You hop from block to block until there’s no room for progression.  At this point, you hit the X button or either of the shoulder bumpers and all the blocks change to new, random positions.  This can include the block you are standing on, or even the block the key sits on.  If either you or the key touch the lava at the bottom of the screen, you’re dead.  Thankfully the key falls slowly, as if it was made of Styrofoam.

There are eighteen stages here.  I figured the gimmick would get stale after one or two levels, but developer Last Man on the Sun actually came up with some pretty clever ways to implement it.  Sometimes only some of the blocks will change.  Sometimes there’s no block to catch the key and you have to race across the screen to grab it before it falls into the lava.  By the end of the game you’ll start to teleport randomly, along with the key AND the door.  Every new twist is sure to have you cursing more than competitors in the Toe Stubbing Competition at the National Center for Tourette Syndrome.

Random the Dungeon makes several mistakes.  Like many 2D platformers, it maps digital-style controls exclusively to the analog stick, sucking some much-needed precision out of the movement.  The jumping can be a bit floaty as well.  The X button also works too slowly when you need to quickly get multiple sets of new blocks, so I recommend using the bumpers.  The biggest problem is the random nature of the game means luck greatly outweighs skill while progressing through it.  No matter how well you might play, you’re at the mercy of whatever alignment of blocks the game gives you each time you randomize.

If this all sounds horrible, trust me, it is.  And yet, it’s still fun.  Random the Dungeon defies all convention by managing to be fairly entertaining despite a concept that shouldn’t work, game play that is entirely up to chance, and less than perfect controls.  I told myself all that would matter on recommending a game is whether or not I had a good time with it.  I had a good time with Random the Dungeon and thus I do recommend it.  It’s annoying, frustrating, stupid, and charming.  It’s the Anne Hathaway of the indie market.

Random the Dungeon was developed by Last Man on the Sun

80 Microsoft Points can’t tell Italians apart from Spaniards in the making of this review.

Turtle Casino

I’m actually at a loss for words on where to begin.  Turtle Casino by Spanish developer X25 Entertainment is so broken on so many levels that I’m having difficulty choosing just one point to get us started.

Well, I guess I should get the ball rolling by describing this abomination.  You play as someone who wins big at a casino and gets turned into a turtle as a result.  Maybe this game is based on Darvin Moon.  Hell, I don’t know.  As a turtle, you have to hop around 40 platforming levels.  Yep, this “casino” game is a platformer.  And a damn awful one at that.

Movement physics are 75% of a platform game.  If they suck, nothing else matters.  In Turtle Casino, they are beyond terrible.  Jumping is floaty and landing is slippery.  Your character moves slow, which I suppose is fitting.  In order to run, you have to hold the X button.   This is also used for long jumping.  The problem is there is NEVER a spot in the game where you don’t want to be running.  The normal speed has no value what so ever.  If you want to save your thumbs, do what I did and tape the X-button down.  Damn Spaniards.

Your ghostly avatar always hovers in the background. You will grow to hate your own digital reflection.

The worst offender is the collision detection.  It’s more off than any game I can remember.  A fireball will miss you by two or three character lengths and you will still die.  You’ll miss landing on spikes with plenty of breathing room and still die.  You’ll miss being impaled by other spiky things and still die.  You’ll jump over a bad guy, land five feet directly behind it, and still die.  Who did the mapping for this?  Ray Charles?

Or since these guys are Spaniards, I should say, Andrea Bocelli.

Level design is bland.  Every generic platforming convention is here.  You’ve all done these same type of levels in dozens of games thus far.  Here they’re pretty much the same, only you can’t be within spitting distance of anything that kills you.  There’s a lives system in place for no reason at all.  If you game over you can start again right where you died.  Sometimes a level has a checkpoint and you might miss out starting from it.  But this also doesn’t make a lot of sense because the checkpoints are usually not that far away from the beginning of the level.  And if you game over you retain whatever points and coins you had earned.

Oh yes, and there’s casino stuff in here too.  I only remembered this because when you game over, instead of it highlighting “continue” on the menu, it highlights the casino games.  So even the game itself knows that the platforming sucks and tries to steer you away from it.  There’s only two casino games.  One is Blackjack.  It’s Blackjack.  You’ve played it a million times and it’s pretty much the same here as it is everywhere else.  At least it works, I suppose.  There’s also Roulette.  It’s Roulette.  A wheel spins.  Yippie.  I spun it once and the game didn’t crash, so I’m satisfied that it likely works, but don’t quote me on that.

There is absolutely nothing decent about Turtle Casino.  Everything about it is way less than mediocre.  The graphics, the controls, the level design, and the concept are all flawed beyond repair.  There’s even some fun glitches too, like respawning inside walls and being trapped in them.  Even if they manage to fix any of the major issues, it would still be among the bottom-tier of games on the marketplace.  It’s the worst thing to come from Spain since Torquemada.  Or Mexico.

Turtle Casino was developed by X25 Entertainment

80 Microsoft Points didn’t actually think Mexico is as bad as Torquemada in the making of this review.  Cuba, on the other hand..

Who is God

Who is God?  Well I thought the answer was obvious: Jeremy Clarkson.  But apparently the guys at Magiko Gaming disagreed.  The latest game by the guys behind the Platformance series is one of those annoying “climb as high as you can” games that are all over the cell phone market like pimples on a teenaged Hershey enthusiast.  I’ve already played a similar title, Niji, and felt it stunk like rancid tuna.  Expectations were set low.

In Who is God you play as one of four deities who must hop from platform to platform on their way towards Heaven.  Jumping is done automatically, so all you really have to do is move the character.  Along the way, you collect stars which can be used to give you a boost, potentially saving you from death or just flinging you higher.  There’s a few different types of platforms to land on.  Some of them disappear once you hop off.  Some of them make new platforms appear.  Some of them steal precious star power from you.  I’m guessing those are called “WELL FUCK!” because that is what I often blurted out when I landed on one.

And that’s pretty much it.  You just climb as high as you can get and try to land on the high score list.  I’m currently #15 on the list and I’m sure everyone else will have the courtesy to not beat my score of 68,868 feet.

Actually by the time I started writing this review, I had already dropped to 18th.  Man, these high score lists can be humbling.  I want another crack at it.

Okay, 72,364.  I moved to 17th at least.  I might actually give it another chance later, but one of the problems is the maps are randomly generated.  Thus there’s always a degree of luck that sometimes outweighs any skill involved.

Who is God has no alternative modes of play right now.  Magiko does have a tendency to patch-in extra stuff later on, so that might change, but for now what you see is what you get.  And what you get is actually a surprisingly fun experience.  If you’re looking for something deep and complex, go read some Melville.  Who is God is pure, stupid bliss.  It’s one of those games that makes your palms sweat and your fingers twitch.  I can’t even tell you what I thought about the graphics or the sound because I was so sucked in to it that I didn’t even notice.  I told my boyfriend I would play it for thirty minutes and I ended up playing for nearly two hours.  That is the mark of a good game.  My only petty complaint is the name.  Who is God.  What is this, Jeopardy?  Otherwise, I really enjoyed it.  And hey, since it seems like the average Xbox 360 owner’s only goal in life is to see how high they can get, this should fit them like a glove.

Who is God was developed by Magiko Gaming

80 Microsoft Points were children of lesser Gods in the making of this review.

Millennium Man

Millennium Man is a 2D platform-puzzler where you play as a dude trying to escape from jail.  The gimmick here is that you have the ability to manipulate time.  It’s an idea that’s been done before, but never quite like this.  At least I don’t think so. I’m sure there will be tons of lifeless douchebags lining up to correct me on that.*

There are ten stages and the object of each is to simply get to the door.  However, the door is often blocked or inaccessible.   This is where  the time gimmick comes into play.  Using the X button, you open up the time device which you can then shift back and forth until the terrain is altered.  It’s kind of like The Time Machine, just without the Morlocks.

Going off the screen-shots, I didn’t expect much from Millennium Man.  It looks like it was drawn using Kid Pix.  And while the gimmick is used decently, my suspicions were mostly correct.  The puzzles are very basic in design, so much so that what’s here feels more like a tutorial.  Given that the whole game takes about fifteen minutes to complete, I think I might be on to something there.  Everything here seems like it’s in an embryonic stage of development.

The graphics are bland, but the real problem was the play control.  This is a platformer, after all.  And once again, we have a game that needed the precision of the digital pad but failed to map to it.  Instead, the analog stick controls everything, and that’s a major flaw.  Without actual analog controls, it makes movement feel slippery and inaccurate.  The jumping is also way off.  The physics are a touch on the floaty side, while some platforms are needlessly placed at the maximum allotted distance, allowing no room for error.

The idea behind Millennium Man feels like the basis for a great game.  Witnessing the environmental changes happen while paused mid-jump is a wonderful thrill.  The final jumping puzzle of the game might be my favorite one yet of any indie game.  And yet all the problems are too much to ignore.  This is under cooked pork.  It’s palatable but you could get worms from it.   Even the control bits don’t up the difficulty here.  You should breeze through the puzzles.  And if you don’t, I’ve included a handy FAQ for Millennium Man.

Q: How do I beat this puzzle in Millennium Man?

A: The average six-year old should be able to beat every puzzle in Millennium Man, Trailer Park King, or Tourist Trap.  If you can’t figure these out on your own, perhaps you should go smoke the tailpipe of your own car because you are officially a Paris Hilton-level functional retard.

Millennium Man was developed by Fixed-Point Consulting LLC

80 Microsoft Points thought Jeremy Irons was sexy as the king of the Morlocks in the making of this review.

*Not everyone who points out every little mistake made in my reviews are lifeless douchebags.  Some of you are mere losers while others just need to get laid.

Fatal Seduction

I’ve busted on Silver Dollar Games a few times since starting Indie Gamer Chick, but I haven’t yet reviewed one of their titles. Oh, I’ve played a few of them, and found them all to be unmitigated pieces of shit. The only one that I thought had any remote value was Try Not To Fart, which is absurd and unfunny but it does serve as a functional game of video Twister.

I was guessing they wouldn’t ever contact me requesting a review of one of their games. And then came the e-mail asking me to check out Fatal Seduction. “Well fuckberries!” I thought. My policy is I can’t turn down a review request so I had to put on the proper manure-handling gear and plunge in. I braced myself for what was sure to be the worst fifteen minutes of my life since I got temporarily paralyzed on the couch while watching America’s Got Talent.

Fatal Seduction is a truly bizarre platforming game. You play as a girl who narrates her story to a psychiatrist in a mental hospital. The game play is incredibly simple. Walk, double jump, stab things, or shoot fireballs at ghosts. Meanwhile, the story is some seriously demented shit. The girl tells the shrink that an angel has told her that she must murder all of her fathers girlfriends to prevent the Antichrist from being born. This leads to three boss encounters with fetuses. I’m not making that up. Go back and read that line. The bosses in this game are demon possessed fetuses that you must stab to death. It’s like Rosemary’s Baby as told by Planned Parenthood.

And I seriously fucking loved it.

Oh I hated the game play. It was boring, repetitive, poorly controlled, badly designed, and as shallow as anything else Silver Dollar Games has turned out. But holy crap, that was a seriously captivating story. And I don’t know who they got to do the voice acting of the girl, but standing ovation for her, the creepy little bitch. If only they had taken this plot and given it to a studio with actual talent in game design, it might have set a new benchmark in excellence on the indie marketplace.

So yes, the actual “game” part of the game sucks, but I do recommend purchasing Fatal Seduction. It only takes fifteen minutes to complete and the narrative more than makes up for any flaws it has. It also might come in handy some day if you want to explain to your significant other why you don’t want to have any kids. It can be your go-to “they could turn out creepy, like this girl” argument. Previously I used the Olson twins.

Fatal Seduction was developed by Silver Dollar Games

80 Microsoft Points embraced contraceptive sponges in the making of this review.

Crosstown

It’s been pointed out to me that I’m a total hypocrite.  I just dumped on Retrocade: DataStream Y2K600 for being “retro” and yet my #1 game is LaserCat, which has a bit of an old-school vibe going for it.  But that doesn’t make me a hypocrite.  It makes me complicated.

I found Crosstown just by cruising randomly through the indie marketplace.  Having been released in 2009, it’s the oldest game I’ve subjected to review thus far.  And it’s actually really good.  You play as this dude with a gun who’s stuck in some crazy town populated by monsters.  The object is to grab four rings in each of the forty stages.  You can shoot the enemies, but you really don’t have to.  For the most part they’ll leave you alone if you leave them alone.  You also can use your gun as a drill to break through walls and get to the rings faster.

Crosstown looks like it will be slow-paced and plodding.  After only a few levels the craziness starts to begin.  Enemies are all over the screen, so much so that they begin to attack each-other.  It opens up multiple options for strategy.  You can go on the offense and gun down as many guys as you can to clear sections of the screen.  Enemies do respawn, but I found this tactic to be effective, especially against baddies that lay extra walls down.  Alternatively, you can try to be a sneak and just go after the enemies who pick up the rings.  I found this usually resulted in beating levels quicker, but at greater risk due to having more monsters on-screen at once.

You’re given a few marginally helpful tools.  Every time you grab a ring, you can spend it towards upgrading your gun, your ability to drill blocks, or your speed.  If you do this, you lose the ring and it will respawn on the board.  For the most part I never needed to use these boosters, although they did come in handy during a boss battle.

I wholeheartedly endorse Crosstown.  It looks old school but at its heart is an awesome action game.  The difference between it and something like Retrocade is here the Jurassic graphics are just dressing for a game that feels like it would fit in during any era.  It’s one of those titles where a simple design can lead to complex game play.  Besides, sometimes retro can be good.  Party like it’s 1983!  Let’s all do cocaine and vote for Ronald Reagan!

Crosstown was developed by Studio Hunty

80 Microsoft Points said “forget it Jake, it’s Crosstown” like a dope in the making of this review.

Retrocade: DataStream Y2K600

I don’t really get retro gaming.  I can see the appeal in occasionally busting out some childhood favorite and kicking back with it.  But most of the time I do that, the session ends with me blurting out “how could I ever think this was any good?”  There’s a segment of developers, both large and small, who try to recapture the look and feel of those dinosauric games thirty or more years later.

Whether this works or not usually depends on what style they’re aping.  For example, Mega Man 9 was successful because it tried to capture the essence of Mega Man 2 or Mega Man 3, aka the only halfway decent entries in that entire series and fuck anyone who disagrees with that.

Did Mega Man 9 work?  Was it still fun?  Yes, it was.  For about five minutes.  Then you likely remembered that we’re now in the future and games have been continuously getting better for the last twenty years.  Why would I spend $10 for it when I can buy a modern game in a clearance bin for the same price?

Nostalgia can be lucrative but it rarely holds up for extended play sessions.  So when MasterBlud recommended Retrocade: DataStream Y2K600 to me, I thought “wow, that’s a terrible name for a game.”  And then I thought “oh goody, an original game in the year 2011 with gameplay and graphics from the year 1976.  How keen.”

Actually, calling it “original” might be  a bit of a stretch.  Retrocade is basically a takeoff on Frogger, even going so far as to have one of its five modes be a clone of it.  The other four modes are pretty much the same.  You control a stick who has to hop around and collect other sticks.  The graphics are straight out of the Atari 2600, which I’m told is a system that required players to use their imagination.  I have absolutely zero imagination, so all I could do was pretend my stick that was picking up other sticks was actually a stick picking up other sticks in a better game.

To keep it real, there is a little fun here.  The mode that stood out to me the most was “Flow Rider.”  It’s simple: move the stick to the top of the screen and then return to the bottom.  The only difference here is once you move onto the play field, you can’t move left or right.  Once you get to the top, the screen starts to fade out and you have to make sure you have the timing down for the return path.  It offers a good challenge and was not an unworthy waste of a few minutes.  “Waypoint,” which is basically the Retrocade’s time-attack mode, is also worth a look at.  Oddly enough the Frogger mode, known here as “Glitcher,” was actually one of the low points of the set.  It’s just not as good as the original and it has some major issues with collision detection. That said, it actually controls better than the official Live Arcade Frogger port .  Way better, in fact.

Retrocade isn’t a bad game by any means.  But it’s a tough sell in this day and age.  Anyone who wants this type of experience would be better served to just dig out some crusty old childhood favorite and give it another look at.  And even if you want something original, there’s a bazillion games that actually date back to that era and I promise you haven’t played even one-tenth of them.  But if you absolutely, positively insist that it has to be a retro game from the year 2011, knock yourself out.  Party like it’s 1977!  Let’s all do mushrooms and go roller skating!

Retrocade: DataStream Y2K600 was developed by QuimbyRBG

80 Microsoft Points don’t know where we went wrong but the feelings gone and we just can’t get it back in the making of this review.

Trailer Park King

Looking for Trailer Park King Episode 2?  The review is here.

Indie games tend to leach onto current fads.  For example, Minecraft has about a dozen knockoffs of varying quality (somewhere between cow shit and pig shit) on the market as we speak.  It’s in that spirit that Freelance Games has looked at the popularity of white trash like Lindsay Lohan, Megan Fox, and Sarah Palin to give us Trailer Park King, a point-and-click adventure.

In it  you play as King, the titular King of the Trailer Park who gets framed for the murder of his girlfriend’s brother.  You’re given a list of ten suspects to check off and have to provide them with various trinkets to get them to give themselves or others alibis.

There’s really not a whole lot of searching to do in Trailer Park King.  In fact I encountered almost no useless clickables.  Everything that can be interacted with is used, except for a TV that asked me if I wanted to watch porn but failed to come through on that.  There is an annoying bit where you have to access a sheep hired by an escort service (don’t ask) to leave the trailer park and visit the nearby jail.  It seemed like busy work for the sake of making a joke.

Otherwise the presentation works.  The game has well done art and full voice acting.  The accents are way over the top, including the worst French-Canadian one I’ve ever heard, but that kind of adds to the camp value of it.  The script is okay.  It’s not anything special but you’re bound to have a few laughs.  Most of the time you’ll just be shaking your head and saying “well that was fucked up.”  I also really didn’t care for the solution to the mystery.  It does end on a bit of a cliffhanger but it happens so fast that I’m not exactly sure what happened.

I still can’t stand this genre of gaming, but Trailer Park King only takes about an hour to complete and thus doesn’t give you enough time to get bored.  The dialog is just funny enough to make you want to push through to the ending, although I can’t imagine anyone would be satisfied with the murderer’s identity.  Still, it’s always fun to take pot shots at easy targets, like those trashy losers who smoke cigarettes, watch alien abduction shows, and get turned on by guys who get high scores at video games.

Trailer Park King was developed…

HEY!  Wait just a fucking second here… I smoke cigarettes, watch alien abduction shows, and get turned on by guys who get high scores in video games.  Um, move along now.

Trailer Park King was developed by Freelance Games

80 Microsoft Points thought “Holy Basket of Crap” sounded like something from Dairy Queen’s menu in the making of this review.

UPDATED, SPOILERIC HALF-ASSED FAQ FOR TRAILER PARK KING
By popular request from you drool-dispensing half-wits who can’t figure out anything for yourselves, here’s some answers for commonly asked questions about Trailer Park King.  Considering this game is so easy it’s under consideration to be released under the Nick Jr. brand name, you should be hanging your head in fucking shame for needing these.  In no particular order…

-NO You can’t actually watch porn.

-You get most of the items from clicking them in the convenience store owned by the French Canadian chick.

-No, you can’t see anyone naked.

-You get the deed to the truck inside Truck’s truck.  You get there by having the sheep escort you to the jail.  Once there, press B to exit and choose “exit to parking lot” off the menu.  Search the seat to get the deed.  You can also bend over so that I can wipe your ass for you, you lazy bastards.

-Once you have the deed, take it to the cop and she’ll sign it over to your girlfriend.  At this point, congratulations, you’ve beaten the game.  Or rather I just beat the game for you.

-No, you can’t go to the shopping mart, or any of the other buildings you see through the telescope except the jail.

-And finally, no, I don’t know what the fucking ending meant either.

Fluffy: Operation Overkill

Remember how fun the hoverbike sequence from Battletoads was?  Wait, you mean to tell me it was an exercise in futility?  That it was your childhood introduction to the rage quit?  That you would sooner have your pee-hole violated by rabid woodpecker than be reminded of it ever again?

Well I don’t think it looked that bad, but I do sympathize with all you poor souls that lived through it.  You see, I never actually played Battletoads. I just known of that level by reputation.  It also seemed to be the inspiration for the boss that ended my play time with Fluffy: Operation Overkill, the latest game picked out for me by my loving-caring-maybe a bit disturbing boyfriend Brian.

I’m not sure what’s up with Brian.  He seems so nice and salt-of-the-Earth most of the time.  And yet he picks out games like this or Bird Assassin for me.  We’ve never talked much about his childhood, but after these choices all I can picture is being raised in some kind of demented barn, being bullied by farm animals, and forming a blood vendetta against everything you would find in a petting zoo.

Fluffy is a side-scrolling shooter where you play as a spooky looking squirrel wearing a hazmat suit who is out to wipe out everything in the forest because they’re allegedly infected with some kind of virus.  I call bullshit on that one.  He looks like he’s just a bit too happy to massacre the cast of Open Season.    Maybe he was looking for an excuse, saw a rabbit sneeze or something and said “well fuck it, end of the world plague, let’s get armed.”  Either way, the only thing the game does have going for it is the sheer scale of violence on display.  When you shoot something, its guts spill out, heads going flying, and blood turns bodies of water red.  I’m sure this alone will be enough to lure in those hopeless torture porn losers who get hard whenever anything on-screen winces in pain.

Strip away the admittedly well done gore and all that’s left is one of the very worst games on the marketplace.  It all starts with the embarrassing controls.  The only option you’re given is to use the control stick.  Why this was done, I have no clue, since there’s nothing analog about it.  The slightest nudge of the stick sends Fluffy full speed ahead.  This would be okay if you could use the digital pad, but you can’t.  I can’t imagine how much this will suck for those saps with first-gen 360 controllers that always seem perma-stuck to the left.  I reckon it would render this game impossible.

The gameplay is completely lacking as well.  You can’t aim anywhere but straight ahead, so every action sequence is just taping the fire button and nothing more.  There are Atari 2600 games that offer more versatility.  Meanwhile, you have floaty jumps and bad collision detection that will leave you taking undeserved damage multiple times.  The first boss battle is a prime example.  You take on some kind of pig thingy that instakills you if you’re within farting distance of it.

And finally there was the Battletoads homage I mentioned above.  In this case, you’re running from a pig driving a combine harvester.  You’re forced to jump over various gates WHILE shooting moles that cling to your body.  The problem is the gates are too close together and your jumping is too slow and unresponsive.  I tried to beat it dozens of times, my blood pressure rising to dangerous levels.  I took a few breaks, until finally I had enough and rage quit.  I intended to go back to it later, only to find that the game had no auto-save and I would have to start over from the beginning.  Fuck that, and fuck Fluffy: Operation Overkill.  It’s a broken, botched, poorly developed piece of shit.  Sure, it looks good, but so does the hooker on the corner.  And like that hooker, Fluffy won’t leave you itching for more.  It will just leave you itchy.

Fluffy: Operation Overkill was developed by SO SO DEV Games

240 Microsoft Points thought a better name for them would be Sucky Crappy Sarcastic Airquote “DEV” Games in the making of this review.